<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.chiromt.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.chiromt.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</description>
        <dc:date>2012-02-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/14/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/10" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/1">
        <title>The Five Eras of Chiropractic &amp; the future of chiropractic as seen through the eyes of a participant observer. </title>
        <description>Chiropractic has endured a turbulent history, marked by tremendous advances in areas such as education and licensing while marred by interprofessional conflict and a poor public image. The prolonged interprofessional conflict was instrumental in shaping the culture of chiropractic.  These obstacles have long-since been removed although there are lingering effects from them.This article examines the chiropractic profession&apos;s history by dividing it into five Eras and suggests that there are three options available for the future of the profession.  One: maintaining the status quo. Two: uniting under an evidence based scientific approach as partners in the health care delivery system that has buried the &quot;one-cause, one-cure&quot; sacred cow.  The steps required to achieve this outcome are outlined. Three: openly dividing the profession into evidence based practitioners and subluxation based practitioners.   Adopting this option would allow each branch of the profession to move forward in the health care delivery system unhindered by the other.It is unclear which option the profession will choose and whether the profession is mature enough to follow option two remains to be seen.  What is evident is that the time to act is now.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>J Keith Simpson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-709X-20-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-709X-20-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/3">
        <title>Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report</title>
        <description>Background:
The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions.
Methods:
The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs.
Results:
By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments.
Conclusions:
Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Gert Bronfort</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mitchell Haas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roni Evans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brent Leiniger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Triano</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-18-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-18-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/13">
        <title>Chiropractic care for paediatric and adolescent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
Psychostimulants are first line of therapy for paediatric and adolescent AD/HD. The evidence suggests that up to 30% of those prescribed stimulant medications do not show clinically significant outcomes. In addition, many children and adolescents experience side-effects from these medications. As a result, parents are seeking alternate interventions for their children. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for behavioural disorders such as AD/HD are increasing with as many as 68% of parents having sought help from alternative practitioners, including chiropractors.ObjectiveThe review seeks to answer the question of whether chiropractic care can reduce symptoms of inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity for paediatric and adolescent AD/HD.
Methods:
Electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Index to Chiropractic Literature) were searched from inception until July 2009 for English language studies for chiropractic care and AD/HD. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select studies. All randomised controlled trials were evaluated using the Jadad score and a checklist developed from the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines.
Results:
The search yielded 58 citations of which 22 were intervention studies. Of these, only three studies were identified for paediatric and adolescent AD/HD cohorts. The methodological quality was poor and none of the studies qualified using inclusion criteria.
Conclusions:
To date there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic care for paediatric and adolescent AD/HD. The claim that chiropractic care improves paediatric and adolescent AD/HD, is only supported by low levels of scientific evidence. In the interest of paediatric and adolescent health, if chiropractic care for AD/HD is to continue, more rigorous scientific research needs to be undertaken to examine the efficacy and effectiveness of chiropractic treatment. Adequately-sized RCTs using clinically relevant outcomes and standardised measures to examine the effectiveness of chiropractic care verses no-treatment/placebo control or standard care (pharmacological and psychosocial care) are needed to determine whether chiropractic care is an effective alternative intervention for paediatric and adolescent AD/HD.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/18/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Fay Karpouzis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rod Bonello</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henry Pollard</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2010, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-18-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-18-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/2">
        <title>Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain.</title>
        <description>Background:
Clinical outcome measures are important tools to monitor patient improvement during treatment as well as to document changes for research purposes.  The short-form Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain patients (BQN) was developed from the biopsychosocial model and measures pain, disability, cognitive and affective domains. It has been shown to be a valid and reliable outcome measure in English, French and Dutch and more sensitive to change compared to other questionnaires.  The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain patients.
Methods:
German translation and back translation into English of the BQN was done independently by four persons and overseen by an expert committee.  Face validity of the German BQN was tested on 30 neck pain patients in a single chiropractic practice.  Test-retest reliability was evaluated on 31 medical students and chiropractors before and after a lecture.  The German BQN was then assessed on 102 first time neck pain patients at two chiropractic practices for internal consistency, external construct validity, external longitudinal construct validity and sensitivity to change compared to the German versions of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD).
Results:
Face validity testing lead to minor changes to the German BQN.  The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for the test-retest reliability was 0.99.  The internal consistency was strong for all 7 items of the BQN with Cronbach alpha&apos;s of .79 and .80 for the pre and post-treatment total scores.  External construct validity and external longitudinal construct validity using Pearson&apos;s correlation coefficient showed statistically significant correlations for all 7 scales of the BQN with the other questionnaires.  The German BQN showed greater responsiveness compared to the other questionnaires for all scales.
Conclusions:
The German BQN is a valid and reliable outcome measure that has been successfully translated and culturally adapted.  It is shorter, easier to use, and more responsive to change than the NDI and NPAD.Key WordsBournemouth Questionnaire; Outcome Assessment; Neck Pain; Chiropractic; Validity of Results</description>
        <link>http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Marina Soklic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Peterson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>B. Kim Humphreys</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-709X-20-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-709X-20-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/4">
        <title>On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review</title>
        <description>ABSTRACTIntroductionA body of basic science and clinical research has been generated on the manual muscle test (MMT) since its first peer-reviewed publication in 1915. The aim of this report is to provide an historical overview, literature review, description, synthesis and critique of the reliability and validity of MMT in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems.
Methods:
Online resources were searched including Pubmed and CINAHL (each from inception to June 2006). The search terms manual muscle testing or manual muscle test were used. Relevant peer-reviewed studies, commentaries, and reviews were selected. The two reviewers assessed data quality independently, with selection standards based on predefined methodologic criteria. Studies of MMT were categorized by research content type: inter- and intra-examiner reliability studies, and construct, content, concurrent and predictive validity studies. Each study was reviewed in terms of its quality and contribution to knowledge regarding MMT, and its findings presented.
Results:
More than 100 studies related to MMT and the applied kinesiology chiropractic technique (AK) that employs MMT in its methodology were reviewed, including studies on the clinical efficacy of MMT in the diagnosis of patients with symptomatology. With regard to analysis there is evidence for good reliability and validity in the use of MMT for patients with neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction. The observational cohort studies demonstrated good external and internal validity, and the 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were reviewed show that MMT findings were not dependent upon examiner bias.
Conclusion:
The MMT employed by chiropractors, physical therapists, and neurologists was shown to be a clinically useful tool, but its ultimate scientific validation and application requires testing that employs sophisticated research models in the areas of neurophysiology, biomechanics, RCTs, and statistical analysis.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Scott Cuthbert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Goodheart</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2007, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-15-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/29">
        <title>Management of people with acute low-back pain: a survey of Australian chiropractors</title>
        <description>IntroductionChiropractors commonly provide care to people with acute low-back pain (LBP). The aim of this survey was to determine how chiropractors intend to support and manage people with acute LBP and if this management is in accordance with two recommendations from an Australian evidence-based acute LBP guideline. The two recommendations were directed at minimising the use of plain x-ray and encouraging the patient to stay active.
Methods:
This is a cross sectional survey of chiropractors in Australia. This paper is part of the ALIGN study in which a targeted implementation strategy was developed to improve the management of acute LBP in a chiropractic setting. This implementation strategy was subsequently tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial. In this survey phase of the ALIGN study we approached a random sample of 880 chiropractors in three States of Australia. The mailed questionnaire consisted of five patient vignettes designed to represent people who would typically present to chiropractors with acute LBP. Four vignettes represented people who, according to the guideline, would not require a plain lumbar x-ray, and one vignette represented a person with a suspected vertebral fracture. Respondents were asked, for each vignette, to indicate which investigation(s) they would order, and which intervention(s) they would recommend or undertake.
Results:
Of the 880 chiropractors approached, 137 were deemed ineligible to participate, mostly because they were not currently practising, or mail was returned to sender. We received completed questionnaires from 274 chiropractors (response rate of 37%). Male chiropractors made up 66% of respondents, 75% practised in an urban location and their mean number of years in practice was 15. Across the four vignettes where an x-ray was not indicated 68% (95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 64%, 71%) of chiropractors responded that they would order or take an x-ray. In addition 51% (95%CI: 47%, 56%) indicated they would give advice to stay active when it was indicated. For the vignette where a fracture was suspected, 95% (95% CI: 91%, 97%) of chiropractors would order an x-ray.
Conclusion:
The intention of chiropractors surveyed in this study shows low adherence to two recommendations from an evidence-based guideline for acute LBP. Quality of care for these patients could be improved through effective implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Further research to find cost-effective methods to increase implementation is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Walker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon French</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Page</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Denise O'Connor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanne McKenzie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Beringer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerry Murphy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jenny Keating</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Michie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jill Francis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sally Green</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2011, null:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-709X-19-29</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-709X-19-29-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/3">
        <title>The role of chiropractic care in older adults</title>
        <description>There are a rising number of older adults; in the US alone nearly 20% of the population will be 65 or older by 2030. Chiropractic is one of the most frequently utilized types of complementary and alternative care by older adults, used by an estimated 5% of older adults in the U.S. annually. Chiropractic care involves many different types of interventions, including preventive strategies. This commentary by experts in the field of geriatrics, discusses the evidence for the use of spinal manipulative therapy, acupuncture, nutritional counseling and fall prevention strategies as delivered by doctors of chiropractic. Given the utilization of chiropractic services by the older adult, it is imperative that providers be familiar with the evidence for and the prudent use of different management strategies for older adults.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiromt.com/content/20/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Dougherty</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cheryl Hawk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Debra Weiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brian Gleberzon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kari Andrew</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Killinger</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2045-709X-20-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2045-709X-20-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20">
        <title>Post-traumatic upper cervical subluxation visualized by MRI: a case report</title>
        <description>Background:
This paper describes MRI findings of upper cervical subluxation due to alar ligament disruption following a vehicular collision. Incidental findings included the presence of a myodural bridge and a spinal cord syrinx. Chiropractic management of the patient is discussed.Case presentationA 21-year old female presented with complaints of acute, debilitating upper neck pain with unremitting sub-occipital headache and dizziness following a vehicular collision. Initial emergency department and neurologic investigations included x-ray and CT evaluation of the head and neck. Due to persistent pain, the patient sought chiropractic care. MRI of the upper cervical spine revealed previously unrecognized clinical entities.
Conclusion:
This case highlights the identification of upper cervical ligamentous injury that produced vertebral subluxation following a traumatic incident. MRI evaluation provided visualization of previously undetected injury. The patient experienced improvement through chiropractic care.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>James Demetrious</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2007, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-12-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-15-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/14/1/1">
        <title>Scoliosis treatment using spinal manipulation and the Pettibon Weighting SystemTM: a summary of 3 atypical presentations</title>
        <description>Background:
Given the relative lack of treatment options for mild to moderate scoliosis, when the Cobb angle measurements fall below the 25&#8211;30&#176; range, conservative manual therapies for scoliosis treatment have been increasingly investigated in recent years. In this case series, we present 3 specific cases of scoliosis.Case presentationPatient presentation, examination, intervention and outcomes are detailed for each case. The types of scoliosis presented here are left thoracic, idiopathic scoliosis after Harrington rod instrumentation, and a left thoracic scoliosis secondary to Scheuermann&apos;s Kyphosis.Each case carries its own clinical significance, in relation to clinical presentation. The first patient presented for chiropractic treatment with a 35&#176; thoracic dextroscoliosis 18 years following Harrington Rod instrumentation and fusion. The second patient presented with a 22&#176; thoracic levoscoliosis and concomitant Scheuermann&apos;s Disease. Finally, the third case summarizes the treatment of a patient with a primary 37&#176; idiopathic thoracic levoscoliosis. Each patient was treated with a novel active rehabilitation program for varying lengths of time, including spinal manipulation and a patented external head and body weighting system. Following a course of treatment, consisting of clinic and home care treatments, post-treatment radiographs and examinations were conducted. Improvement in symptoms and daily function was obtained in all 3 cases. Concerning Cobb angle measurements, there was an apparent reduction in Cobb angle of 13&#176;, 8&#176;, and 16&#176; over a maximum of 12 weeks of treatment.
Conclusion:
Although mild to moderate reductions in Cobb angle measurements were achieved in these cases, these improvements may not be related to the symptomatic and functional improvements. The lack of a control also includes the possibility of a placebo effect. However, this study adds to the growing body of literature investigating methods by which mild to moderate cases of scoliosis can be treated conservatively. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether curve reduction and/or manipulation and/or placebo was responsible for the symptomatic and functional improvements noted in these cases.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/14/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark Morningstar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timothy Joy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2006, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-01-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-14-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-14-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-01-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/10">
        <title>How can chiropractic become a respected mainstream profession?  The example of podiatry</title>
        <description>Background:
The chiropractic profession has succeeded to remain in existence for over 110 years despite the fact that many other professions which had their start at around the same time as chiropractic have disappeared. Despite chiropractic&apos;s longevity, the profession has not succeeded in establishing cultural authority and respect within mainstream society, and its market share is dwindling. In the meantime, the podiatric medical profession, during approximately the same time period, has been far more successful in developing itself into a respected profession that is well integrated into mainstream health care and society.ObjectiveTo present a perspective on the current state of the chiropractic profession and to make recommendations as to how the profession can look to the podiatric medical profession as a model for how a non-allopathic healthcare profession can establish mainstream integration and cultural authority.DiscussionThere are several key areas in which the podiatric medical profession has succeeded and in which the chiropractic profession has not. The authors contend that it is in these key areas that changes must be made in order for our profession to overcome its shrinking market share and its present low status amongst healthcare professions. These areas include public health, education, identity and professionalism.
Conclusion:
The chiropractic profession has great promise in terms of its potential contribution to society and the potential for its members to realize the benefits that come from being involved in a mainstream, respected and highly utilized professional group. However, there are several changes that must be made within the profession if it is going to fulfill this promise. Several lessons can be learned from the podiatric medical profession in this effort.</description>
        <link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Donald Murphy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Schneider</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Seaman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Perle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Craig Nelson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies 2008, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-08-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-1340-16-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Manual Therapies</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2045-709X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

